MA Home 

In This Issue 

Late-Breaking News

Contributing Editors Contact Information

Exclusive Online Features 

 MA Digital
Archives

Back Issues

Send a Letter to the Editor 

Author Guidelines 

Modeler's Mall Guidelines 

Focal Point Guidelines 

Sport Aviator 

Subscribe 

Address Change 

Available Plans 

Back
Issues/Article Reprints
 

Advertisers

Advertising Information 

Join AMA  

Contest Calendar 

AMA Home




 



Could that have happened
in the United States?


By now, I am sure that most AMA members have heard about the tragic accident that happened in Hungary that resulted in the deaths of two spectators. A number of AMA members have suggested that AMA conduct a full inquiry and report the findings to the membership.

    That concept is full of issues that are difficult to resolve. In the first place, this accident happened in Eastern Europe so our access to information is limited, but the issue goes well beyond that.

    The question becomes whether the sport is better served by talking more about this tragic accident or discussing it less; that isn't an easy question to answer. I decided that some explanation of what happened would have more positive elements than negative, so I will outline the situation as I have been able to determine it.

    I have had contact with aero club officers in Germany and Hungary. The accident occurred during an air show in Hungary. I believe the site was a typical European aero club where full-scale aircraft—primarily gliders—and model airplanes are part of the shared club.

    The person involved was an experienced German RC pilot, known by many as a top-notch air-show flier. He had taken all of the reasonable steps to ensure that there was no radio interference, including flying a test aircraft at the site for a few days before the event.

    The accident occurred when the model, a Giant Scale biplane weighing approximately 44 pounds, went out of control and crashed into the spectator area. The airplane was flying from the right after performing a turn-around maneuver when the pilot lost control of it. The model rolled, veered to the left, and crashed into the spectator area.

    From when the pilot apparently lost control until impact could be measured in single-digit seconds. Unfortunately, the model hit and killed a husband and wife who were taken to the air show by their adult children.

    After initial investigation of the accident by the authorities, it was determined that a broadcast station had transmitted signals on the frequency on which the model was flying, effectively shooting the aircraft down. The investigation is ongoing so this may not be the final ruling.

    Could that have happened in the United States? The crash and the fatalities could certainly happen, but the apparent cause is highly unlikely to occur here. We are fortunate that we don't share our specific frequencies with any other services, but the accident brings home the need to be very careful with transmitter impound since another RC transmitter could cause this type of control loss.

    This tragedy again brings up the subject of fail-safe. I have not been able to determine with any authority whether the model involved in this accident was equipped with fail-safe or how it may have been set. I was able to find a crude video of the accident, and after careful review I think that the model probably did have some form of fail-safe, which is common in PCM radios.

    I couldn't determine if it was set to low throttle from the video, but it was apparent to me that the throttle position would have had little effect on the speed of the aircraft at impact. The model was in a shallow dive from when control was lost until impact; it would not have slowed appreciably even with the engine shut down.

    This was a terrible accident and I'm sure it will have a lasting effect on RC aeromodeling throughout the world. We need to learn as much as we can from this tragedy to avoid a similar occurrence in the future.

    While retarding the throttle with fail-safe would—or perhaps did—have little effect on this accident, there is little question that setting the fail-safe to retard the throttle would be the prudent thing to do in most failure situations.

    In any situation, a fail-safe system cannot be expected to work any better than the pilot's familiarity with its operation and settings. If you are not completely familiar with the fail-safe features of any of your radios, it would be prudent to read the instruction manual and become familiar with them. Till next month.  MA

Til next month ...


Dave Brown, AMA president


Comments on the magazine?
or call Model Aviation Editorial offices: (765) 287-1256, ext. 224.
  (8 a.m.-5 p.m. weekdays). Fax: (765) 289-4248.
Address: 5161 E. Memorial Dr., Muncie IN 47302

This page, and all contents, are Copyright © 1995-2007 by the Academy of Model Aeronautics Inc. 
The AMA Wings & Torch are trademarks of the Academy of Model Aeronautics. 
All rights reserved.